Theory of dynamic competition
Posted by John Humphreys on May 8, 2007
Standard economics teaches of “perfect competition” as an equilibrium outcome where price equals marginal cost, economic profit is zero and efficiency is maximised. This is a static theory of competition. Competition is also a process and the theory of that process is the “theory of dynamic competition”.
This essay suggests that dynamic competition drives economic growth. Further, efforts aimed at achieving static competition (eg restricting mergers and market behvaiour) are likely to harm dynamic competition and therefore harm economic growth.
What is “dynamic competition”?
Dynamic competition is the process by which market players attempt to maximise their profits by competing in a marketplace that has other players who are also trying to maximise their own profits and welfare.
Dynamic competition cannot be measured by the number of firms in a market or by how close the market is to “perfect competition”. Dynamic competition is measured by the barriers to entry and exit.
Dynamic competition is a constant process of innovation and immitation as firms attempt to organise their resources in such a way to maximise profits (by increasing revenue and/or decreasing costs). For an individual business, innovation and immitation are both new knowledge with costs to acquire.
The drive to acquire knew knowledge comes not only from the desire for more profit, but also from the more urgent desire to not lose current profits (or go out of business). Monopoly-pull incentive v competition-push incentive.
As knowledge requirements are constantly changing (changed preferences, resources, competitor behaviour etc) a firm must constantly be searching for new knowledge.
While immitation and innovation have the same impact on an individual business (as they are both new knowledge to the individual business) only innovation increases the total store of knowledge in an economy. Consequently, only innovation drives economic growth.
John Humphreys said
Recommended by Kate Morrison (Volterra Pacific): Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long-Term Economic Growth, by Richard G. Lipsey, Kenneth I. Carlaw, and Clifford T. Bekar.
Terje (Say Tay-a) said
My better half is finishing her PHD shortly. Her area of research is in knowledge acquisition although it is from a computer science perspective not an economists perspective. Essentially it explores the time required to transfer knowledge from one entity to another. In effect her paper explores the time cost associated with knowledge acquisition.
Contrary to what you imply above there is a risk in reading other peoples R&D. And that is that they may have got it wrong or they may not have fully qualified the circumstances in which the knowledge is applicable or you may read it but not understand it correctly. Also a lot of the knowledge derived from R&D is tacit knowledge and will not transfer easily even if the owners of the knowledge write lots of papers and are determined to transfer their knowledge. This is a big part of why companies buy other companies rather than just copy their ideas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_knowledge
Also worth exploring from managment theory is the concept encapsulated in the Johari Window metaphor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_Window
In the current political debate about apprenticeships and vocational knowledge a lot of this has real world implications. An apprentice in say carpentary needs to hang around a carpenter for several years in order to absorb the tacit knowledge that is not easily transfered through formal education.
Kate Morrison said
JH, you may have come across these already…
Potts on Evolutionary Economics in Policy, and
Potts, J. ‘Knowledge and Markets’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11 (2001), pp. 413–31
Kate Morrison said
…by which I mean to suggest that George Shackle and Brian Loasby are worth reading on economic growth as a growth of knowledge process:
Shackle, G.L.S.(1972). Epistemics & Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1-56000-558-0
Loasby, B. (1999). Knowledge, institutions and evolution in economics. London: Routledge
Alinestra said
Dynamic Competition (the economic theory not the biochemical one) doesn’t have a page at Wikipedia. I’m not doing a PhD but am interested in Schumpeter’s theory of Creative Destruction, which is on Wikipedia.
Thank you for your definition of Dynamic Competition. It would be cool if you edited Wikipedia with what is on this page here as it is quite helpful.