My PhD

Competition, knowledge & economic growth

Knowledge v human capital

Posted by John Humphreys on March 3, 2007

It is important to draw a distinction between “knowledge” and “human capital”. Knowledge is the total amount of ideas available to an economy, independent of how many people know the ideas. This is the relevant factor for considering the changes and growth in the total capacity of an economy.

Human capital (like all capital) is important — but ultimately it cannot cause economic growth.

Education does not increase the total amount of knowledge in society. Education provides more human capital (by mixing pre-existing base resources with pre-existing knowledge) but it does not increase the amount of knowledge. If knowledge were to be held constant then we would move to a steady state of human capital with education equal to human capital depreciation, and no economic growth.

One Response to “Knowledge v human capital”

  1. c8to said

    correct…as far as growth caused by knowledge…which is the prime cause of growth…

    but growth can actually happen independant of knowledge creation.

    a growing population might lead to growth in per capita income with no new knowledge as economies of scale kick in without any change in human knowledge…this however is a trivial and probably uninteresting effect…

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>